According to statistics most sociopathic personalities, as President Chavez, has a tragic ending.
should not be a psychiatrist or psychologist, or even need to be taken to reach any kind of literature on the subject, that a Venezuelan anyone realize that our President has ceased to be for quite some time to become Presiding Venezuela.
In an interview he already has two and half years of publication, Dr. Franzel Delgado before three of the many questions that will make her interviewer, answer the following:
"Is there any pathological settings in the case Head of State? There clear characteristics allow, without difficulty, consider a type of personality structure sociopathic and narcissistic. Sociopathic personality disorders are defined in universal classifications of psychiatry. These are people who are biologically designed to violate the rules, do not exercise loyalty, do not act with truth, have emotional lives extremely unstable in structure no sensitivity, no regrets, have to live permanently in the conflict, not know how to live in peace with others, and very manipulative.
And the narcissistic personality? In the case of narcissism, the perception that the person has of itself is unrealistic, it is exaggerated is the belief of being unique, you feel above others. Any wrongdoing is possible to meet those needs narcissistic personality. Because narcissists feel predestined to a very special situation, it is perfectly feasible that might harbor the fear that people are interested in removing them. The fear of an assassination of the President before it is absolutely justifiable. If we review the universal statistics, we find that a significant proportion of people with sociopathic disorders dead ends. Because they are aggressive, are conflicting, violate the rights of others, and at some point in their lives, someone charged. "
The interview is priceless, because the year in which the interview takes place, specifically the March 20, 2007, the characteristics identified by Dr. Delgado, were not appreciated by those who felt sympathy for the Presidency Chávez, but read in 2010, makes you ask yourself, is it possible that so many people, so many governments, many institutions have not seen, but the really amazing is that there are still things to do or not noticed .
The interview ends with the question " What do you think will be the destination President? If this so-called revolution had any chance of amendment, the option of retaining much higher. But from the point of view of psychiatry there is no possibility of amendment, given the President's personality structure, which is unchangeable, this revolution will continue toward the cliff. Inevitably, from the point of view of science, Chavez has something secure in his future, which is loneliness. "
particular I think, that this known psychiatrist only an error of assessment, I imagine that by their attachment to" booklet "which is, in that neither mentioned and certainly not considered a particular important personality of the Chair and is its remarkably low "threshold value", not to mention its high level of cowardice, failing that it is a safeguard, it will take to their heels in the first time someone tells that is in danger, as happened in 1992 when he pleaded that the museum would seek a General Military Hitórico army friend or ally "or in 2002 when he ran desperately to surrender without coercion or compulsion to building of the Army Headquarters on the morning of April 12, without even knowing who was going to give up. As
says Dr. Franzel Delgado, if the Presidency had "a chance to amend" the period of survival would be greater, but as not, we will see the results of what is upon us in the next two years, when at last the reality of socialism will be shattered against electoral wall 2012. Meanwhile, continue the campaign of provocation for a military uprising, civil-military or civilian, that a victory over the psyche of an entire country, will continue to expropriation, political prisoners and insults towards those who like it. Anyway, if the country will not be yours after 2012, who cares what state she leaves. Who
as humorous anecdote, account in your career history to have ruined a bar when he was captain of the Venezuelan army will continue its course is the way to do the same to an entire country, in total and absolute opposition to what a sane person would make having a disastrous first experience. And what's worse, even though thousands of voices from different parts of the world and from many sectors have warned of their errors, he, encouraged by the flattery of their environment, interpret their messages that witches and soothsayers or perhaps compelled by the voices from the past history and nest in your mind, it does commit suicide "acts of state" who irresponsibly publishes dazzled by the lights of the stage where mounts his quixotic shows independence and anti-imperialist.
No doubt in the future when examining the phenomenon that set us back several decades political, economic, social and culturally, we can appreciate that "socialism of the century" had its moment of rapid ascent for ten years until peaking when he stopped at the time the tiny Honduras refused to fall into his hands and slowly began a descent, which as any free fall can not block the effects of continuous acceleration, so much worse than 2008, it was in 2009 that it worse, it was in 2010, justifying what would happen in 2011 and 2012.
Although the movement of socialism Chavez parabolic rise meant that increased the sense of power of leadership and to the sudden wealth of his close followers, the other end, down the surprisingly convinced that continued to rise, a perception which justifies its distortion downline isolation from reality in which the Venezuelan population was a reality that awaits them as the saying goes native "in bajadita."
Many socialists known as "Bolibourgeois" are already aware of their destination, but there is one, one that moves at a gallop toward the goal that has not managed to achieve in 12 years, as Hitler in 1945, even with the Soviet Army entering Berlin from the east and the west's ally , threatened to crush them and gave orders to an army or nonexistent in a more recent example, Saddam Hussein and his ministers, who only on television, proclaimed victoriously crushing victories over the "weak" coalition troops who were "trying unsuccessfully to" win access to Baghdad and as many anti-aircraft batteries, carpeted the ground in Iraq with aircraft that vainly tried to violate the "sovereignty" the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment